Quantcast
Channel: AOL UK
Viewing all 18742 articles
Browse latest View live

Waitrose and Aldi grow market share

$
0
0

Filed under:

AldiWaitrose and Aldi have built on their record share of the grocery market as shopping habits continue to be driven by "austerity and provenance".

The latest Kantar Worldpanel figures for the 12 weeks to March 17 show further market polarisation, with Waitrose growing sales by 12.5% and extending its market share to 4.8%, from 4.4% a year earlier.

Budget chain Aldi's sales were up 30.8%, boosting its share from 2.6% a year ago to 3.3%. Tesco is still the market leader, although lacklustre growth of 1.1% means its market position is down to 29.4% from 30.2% in the same period of 2012.

Sainsbury's is the clear winner among the big four supermarkets, with year-on-year growth of 6.2% ahead of total market growth of 3.9%, taking its share to 16.9% from 16.6%.

The figures cover a period of low wage growth and rising inflation and as shoppers grapple with the fall-out from the industry's horse meat scandal.

Fraser McKevitt, retail analyst at Kantar Worldpanel, said: "Austerity and provenance are the key factors behind the varying retailer performances this month.

"Continued pressure on household budgets has helped Aldi, Lidl and Iceland to record market-beating growths while Waitrose and Sainsbury's have managed to mostly avoid adverse media coverage from the horse meat scandal."

Lidl's sales grew by 10.5% in the period, taking its market share to 2.9%, while Iceland grew by 8.7%, with a market share of 2.1%.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


William's RAF rescue role to end

$
0
0

Filed under:

Duke of CambridgeThe Duke of Cambridge's days as an RAF Sea King pilot are numbered following confirmation that Britain's search-and-rescue helicopter service is to be privatised.

The £1.6 billion deal with US-headquartered Bristow Helicopters ends 70 years of a service run by the RAF and Royal Navy squadrons and spells the end of the use of Sea King helicopters in search-and-rescue (SAR) work.

Prince William, 30, a flight lieutenant based at RAF Valley on Anglesey, is understood to have voiced concern over privatisation plans when he met Prime Minister David Cameron in Zurich, Switzerland, as part of England's 2018 World Cup bid in 2011.

The future Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces joined C Flight, 22 Squadron at RAF Valley in September 2010.

He qualified as an operational search and rescue captain last year and now has a full-time job - albeit with time off for royal appearances - rescuing stranded climbers and stricken vessels on emergency missions in Sea King helicopters.

The RAF said it would stop its search and rescue work from March 2016.

A spokesman said employees will then be faced with a number of possibilities which include ground-based roles and airborne roles, both in the UK and overseas. They will also have the option to apply to leave the RAF.

Under the new contract, 22 state-of-the-art helicopters will operate from 10 locations around the UK.

Ten Sikorsky S92s will be situated, two per site, at Stornoway and Sumburgh in Scotland, and at new bases at airports in Newquay in Cornwall, Caernarfon in Wales - which will take over operations previously covered by Prince William's base - and Humberside.

Ten AgustaWestland AW189s will operate, two per site, from Lee on Solent and a new hangar at Prestwick Airport, and new bases which will be established at St Athan, Inverness and Manston airports. All bases will be operational 24 hours a day.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Should I Buy National Grid plc For My ISA?

$
0
0

Filed under:

I've long been a fan of Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) as tax-efficient wrappers for equity holdings. Quite simply, if you're going to buy and sell shares -- especially as a long-term investor -- then it makes sense to do so inside an ISA.

There's no further income tax to pay on dividends; no capital gains tax to pay at all; and total freedom from the burden of reporting both income and capital gains to the taxman. Want to know more? Start here.

And simply put, from both the capital gains and income perspectives, I reckon National Grid (LSE: NG) (NYSE: NGG.US) makes an ideal ISA share. Why? Let's take a look.

Decent yield

Trading today on a forecast yield of 5.5%, an investor making full use of his or her £11,280 annual ISA allowance for 2012-13 to buy National Grid could earn £620 in dividends next year -- without having to pay a penny more in income tax. Which is especially useful if you're a higher-rate taxpayer, of course.

Better still, National Grid is a cash cow with a long-term track record of throwing off juicy dividends -- and juicy dividend growth -- year after year. Which is why, of course, it's long been a share that's popular with income investors.

And just look at what that growth has delivered. Back in 2008 -- the start of the worst recession in 60 years, you'll remember -- National Grid investors were rewarded with an annual dividend of 29.67p per share. For 2012, the dividend was 39.28p per share.

Over the period 2008-2012, that's an annual growth rate of 7.3% -- comfortably ahead of the rate of inflation over the period, and a decent return from a dull, boring utility.

And as a utility, what's more, National Grid is also a strongly defensive share. Owning and operating networks that deliver electricity and gas across the UK, the business also has millions of customers in the northeastern Unites States, with revenues split roughly 50-50 between the UK and the United States.

So investors can be reasonably assured that the revenues, earnings and dividend growth the share has delivered in the past, will continue into the future.

Capital upside

Now, the principal charm of safe and boring utilities is clearly for income investors, via the sector's safe and predictable earnings.

But National Grid is a utility with a difference: here in the UK, it leaves others to sell directly to consumers, restricting its own offerings to operating the networks through which gas and electricity flow. Which in terms of regulatory supervision, gives it a little more wiggle room, and scope for capital growth.

In the last week, for instance, National Grid's shares have hit a 52-week high, on the back of its announcement that it has agreed price controls with Ofgem for the next eight years, helping to pave the way for the company to decide on its future dividend policy.

In short, while the upside in National Grid's share price is never going to be electrifying, it still makes no sense to pay capital gains tax, if sheltering the investment in an ISA can avoid that risk.

Good company

Another investor with an eye on dependable dividend-paying shares is investing legend Neil Woodford. And with £21 billion under management, coupled to a track record of comfortably outstripping the returns from the market as a whole, Mr Woodford is a voice worth listening to.

Over the past five years, for instance, his Invesco Perpetual High Income fund has returned precisely double the return from the FTSE All-Share index. And an investor putting £10,000 into his High Income fund back in 1988 would have seen it grow to £193,000 today -- that's quite some return.

Interested in discovering what other shares this investing maestro owns? Motley Fool analysts have just updated one of our most popular free reports -- 8 Shares Held By Britain's Super-Investor -- in the light of recent changes in Mr Woodford's portfolio. To download the report, simply click here. It's free, so what have you go to lose?

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

UK on brink of triple-dip recession

$
0
0

Filed under:


Britain remains on the brink of a triple-dip recession after figures confirmed the economy contracted by 0.3% at the end of 2012.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) stuck by its previous estimate for the fourth quarter, although it now thinks the UK economy grew by 0.3% across the whole of last year, rather than previous guidance of 0.2%.
GDP figures for the current quarter are due to be released at the end of April, with the recent cold weather increasing the chances of two successive quarters of contraction, which would represent a return to recession.

The country's stagnant performance reflects a fall in industrial production of 2.1% in the fourth quarter - including a 10.7% slump in mining and quarrying - and the biggest fall since the first quarter of 2009.

However, household spending in the fourth quarter increased by more than previously thought, up 0.4% from an earlier 0.2% reading. Total disposable incomes rose by 2.1% during the year as a whole, but slipped back 0.1% in the fourth quarter.

IHS Global Insight economist Howard Archer said: "It looks touch and go whether the economy can avoid further contraction in the first quarter of 2013, and hence a 'triple-dip' recession." He said heavy snowfall, which has hit parts of the UK in recent days, increased the chances of another quarter of falling output.

Marginal growth of 0.3% in 2012 compared with 1% in 2011. The figures also showed a household savings ratio of 7.1%, the highest since 1997, as people choose to save rather than spend. This figure was boosted by a £20.1 billion increase in wages and salaries versus 2011.

The UK's current account deficit shrank to £14 billion in the fourth quarter - worth 3.6% of GDP - from an upwardly revised £15.1 billion in the third quarter. For the year as a whole the UK's current account deficit was £57.7 billion.

The trade deficit - the difference between the value of Britain's exports and imports - widened to £9.6 billion in the fourth quarter, up from £8.1 billion in the previous quarter. Companies exported 1.6% fewer goods in the fourth quarter, while services exports fell 1.8%. Dr Archer said: "This export performance is really disappointing, even allowing for the problems in the eurozone and generally muted global growth, and is a blow to hopes that the economy can rebalance."

The UK's persistent economic weakness has already led to the loss of its prized AAA rating.

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

UK pensioners in Cyprus cut off by crisis

$
0
0

Filed under:

ATM queue in CyprusAP Photo/Pavlos Vrionides

UK pensioners in Cyprus are facing a major challenge to survive, after the UK government decided to stop paying pensions into banks in Cyprus. Many are pooling resources or living off charitable donations.

So how could this happen?

Banks closed

The situation for everyone in Cyprus is difficult. The banks have been closed for two weeks - and will open tomorrow. Even then there are likely to be restrictions on how much money can be transferred or withdrawn.

In the interim, ATMs have been operating, but banks have limited the maximum sums people can withdraw - in order to prevent a run on the banks. The two main banks in the country set the daily limit at 100 euros. It has lead to a number of demonstrations and long queues at ATMs around the country.

Pensioners

However, for UK pensioners, the problem has been compounded by the fact that the government has suspended payments to Cyprus bank accounts, based on concerns over what would happen to deposits in Cyprus banks. As we reported yesterday, payments will not resume when banks in Cyprus reopen.

Those who have UK bank accounts have been able to redirect their pension payments into those and get hold of the money that way. However, around two thirds of UK pensioners in Cyprus have no UK accounts.

Those who have sufficient funds have been able to live off their savings, by withdrawing their daily allowance of cash - and paying by debit card where possible.

However, those who slip through the cracks have nothing. The BBC has reported that many have turned to charity, and that churches have been handing out food.

Solutions

The Department of Work and Pensions says there are solutions, and they have been trying to contact people who have been hit by the freeze. They say money can be paid into the account of a UK friend or relative, or individuals can set up a new UK bank account through an emergency service the Treasury has arranged with Barclays.

Pensions Minister Steve Webb said in a written statement to Parliament: "We are advising customers to change the bank account into which payments are made, for example by nominating an alternative bank account or the account of a trusted friend. This is a practical measure to ensure that payments reach our customers promptly, and we are not advising these customers to close their Cypriot bank accounts."

However, pensioners told the BBC they were unconvinced that this would help, as the woes of the banking sector in Cyprus mean that most businesses are only accepting cash.

 
More stories

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Pru fined £30m over AIA bid plans

$
0
0

Filed under:


Prudential has been hit with a £30 million fine after it kept regulators in the dark over plans for a business-changing Asian takeover.

The insurer's chief executive Tidjane Thiam was also censured after the Financial Services Authority (FSA) complained it had not been told about the 2010 bid for AIG's Asian subsidiary AIA in a move worth £23 billion.
Prudential should have informed the FSA at the earliest opportunity in order to allow the watchdog to decide on whether to approve or reject any deal.

In one of its last actions before it is replaced by the UK's new regulatory regime on Monday, the FSA said Prudential and Mr Thiam's failings represented a "serious error of judgement" for which the company is now paying the price.

The ill-fated deal, which eventually collapsed amid shareholder uproar, would have involved a UK record shareholder cash call of £14.5 billion and transformed the group's financial position, according to the FSA.

It added: "The transaction had the potential to impact upon the stability and confidence of the financial system in the UK and abroad."

The FSA, which did not learn about the proposed acquisition until after it had been leaked to the media, said it was forced to consider highly-complex issues relating to the transaction within a compressed timescale.

The Pru was overly influenced by its concern about the risk of leaks, despite being told by advisers about the importance of keeping the regulator informed.

Pru chairman Paul Manduca, who joined the company in the wake of the failed deal, said Mr Thiam had acted in the best interests of the company and with full knowledge of the board.

He added: "Prudential works hard to maintain close and positive relationships with its regulators, and the group's relationship with the FSA continues to be good. The FSA has determined that it should have been informed earlier about the fact we were contemplating the AIA transaction and we regret, with hindsight, not so doing."

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Council tax bills set to rise 0.8%

$
0
0

Filed under:

Monopoly housesCouncil tax bills will rise by a below-inflation average of 0.8% across England this year, the Department for Communities and Local Government announced.

But a third of councils have rejected the offer of central Government help to enable them to freeze bills for residents in 2013/14.
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said this year's rise amounts to a real-terms cut in council tax, which has fallen by 9.7% in real terms under the coalition Government, once inflation has been taken into account.

Mr Pickles said: "Council tax more than doubled under Labour. But Conservatives in Government have worked to freeze council tax for three years, helping hard-working families and pensioners with their cost of living. Over the last three years, council tax bills have fallen by almost 10%. Ed Miliband's Labour Party opposes freezing council tax, which shows how Labour remain addicted to higher taxes, and are on the side of bureaucracy, wasteful spending and not the taxpayer."

DCLG figures show that the average Band D council tax set by local authorities in England for 2013-14 will be £1,456, up from £1,444 in 2012/13. The average in London will be £1,302, compared with £1,421 in metropolitan areas, £1,486 in unitary authority areas and £1,510 in shire districts. In all, 257 of the 421 eligible English authorities (61%) qualified for a DCLG grant worth 1% of their council tax bills by imposing a freeze or reduction in the charge - down from 90% in 2012/13.

Councils imposing the highest rises for 2013/14 in percentage terms are Conservative-held Breckland in Norfolk (7.6%), North Dorset (4.8%), East Lindsey in Lincolnshire (4.4%) and South Cambridgeshire (4.3%), and Labour-held Exeter (4%). But the largest bills to be landing on Band D doorsteps will be in Rutland (£1,701), Hartlepool (£1,686), Kingston-upon-Thames (£1,683), Newark & Sherwood (£1,657) and Central Bedfordshire (£1,652). And some of the largest percentage rises are to be found in fire and rescue authorities in the West Midlands (10.4%), West Yorkshire (9.5%), Greater Manchester (9.5%), Leicestershire (9.4%), Berkshire (9%), Cambridgeshire (8.35) and Dorset (8.2%).

Authorities increasing their demands by more than 2% are required to hold a referendum to seek public approval, though there is an exemption for any rises which are worth less than £5, which means that big percentage hikes in the fire authorities will not have to be put to a poll. Many councils avoided a referendum by imposing rises of 1.9% or 2% - a practice previously condemned by Mr Pickles as "democracy dodging". Some 131 Conservative councils - around seven out of 10 - are freezing their council tax, compared with 51 Labour - about half - and 10 Liberal Democrat.

Local Government Association chairman Sir Merrick Cockell said local authorities want to keep council tax down, pointing out that "the vast majority" froze bills over the past two years and many have done the same this year. But he added: "The Government's offer to help local authorities freeze council tax is a short-term one which does not address the huge long-term pressures facing councils, including bigger cuts than almost any other part of the public sector and an immediate and growing crisis in funding care for the elderly. Government has cut council funding by 33% and, with last week's Budget signalling further cuts to come, local authorities have to consider the impact this will have on local services and the people who rely on them."

Shadow communities secretary Hilary Benn said: "Local councils have of course done their best to freeze council tax where they can, given the squeeze on family incomes. But it is astonishing that Eric Pickles is trying to claim a success when over two million people on the very lowest incomes won't be getting their council tax frozen. Instead they will see their council tax rise next month because of his new unfair poll tax. They will be hit by the cuts in council tax benefit that he is imposing, while at the same time David Cameron is giving a tax cut to millionaires."

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "Rises in council tax are the last thing families need after the last decade of hikes in a tax that hits those on low and moderate incomes the hardest. At a time when household budgets are being squeezed by stagnant wages and rising prices, councils have a duty to ease the burden they place on residents. While many have chosen to freeze council tax and some have even cut it, those town halls pushing ahead with tax hikes should think again and follow the example of those authorities which have kept bills low while maintaining high quality services."

 
More stories

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

What do farmers and executives have in common? Crippling debt

$
0
0

Filed under:

Farmer in the snowOwen Humphreys/PA

Farmers and executives are rarely united, but at the moment, it seems they are all in it together. New research has revealed that despite a slight drop in the number of people going bankrupt in 2012, there are some groups that bucked the trend and are going bust even faster than a year earlier.

So why are executives and farmers feeling the strain?


The research, from Experian, found that in 2012 the two groups with the fastest-growing levels of personal insolvency were what they call 'rural solitudes' and 'professional rewards'.

Farmers

The 'rural solitudes' include farmers and those who have retired to the countryside. This group, a high proportion of which are married and living in the South West, saw insolvencies rise from 3.98% of total insolvencies in 2011 to 4.4% in 2012.

Farmers have been under particular strain from bad weather, with the rain destroying crops and silage for dairy herds, and the snow stalling any spring revival. At the same time they have had to contend with disease rampant among cows and sheep, and rocketing feed prices.

Meanwhile, many are on fixed contracts with retailers, so cannot reflect these costs in the sums they charge for their produce. There are only so many times farmers can put off paying their food bill before they succumb.

Managers

The 'professional rewards' group, meanwhile, is one of the UK's most affluent sectors. This demographic, which represents company managers and senior executives, typically married with children and living in suburban areas, saw a rise in personal insolvencies, from 5.15% of the total insolvencies across the UK during 2011 to 5.6% in 2012.

This group includes both managers in big businesses and the owners of small and medium-sized business. Business owners in particular have been facing difficult times, as a combination of rising costs and bad debts have pushed many under. The longer that the financial crisis continues, the more businesses will eventually buckle under the weight of debt.

The good news for these groups is that they still represent a tiny proportion of all insolvencies - less than 0.5%.

Most bankrupt

The groups which are most likely to declare themselves insolvent saw their share of insolvencies fall. The most bankrupt group remained the 'ex-council community', representing those typically living on council estates who have exercised their right to buy. However, they saw their share of insolvencies fall from 13.74% to 13.57%.

They are followed by 'suburban mindsets' - usually married and bringing up children in the burbs - who saw their share of bankruptcies fall from 9.07% to 8.9%.

The geographical picture was one of wild variations too. While the total number of individuals being declared insolvent fell across the country, some areas of the UK, particularly Scotland, continued to struggle.

The Scottish town of Clydebank saw the biggest increase in insolvencies last year. Furthermore, the top five towns with the highest concentration of personal insolvencies were in Scotland: Edinburgh, Dundee, Aberdeen, Motherwell, and Glasgow (Parkhead).

Jonathan Westley, Managing Director of Experian's Consumer Information Services UK and Ireland, commented: "While it is encouraging to see that personal insolvency levels are continuing to fall in the UK overall, it is clear that there are still pockets of the UK that are feeling the strain.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


EC demands £9.5bn for unpaid bills

$
0
0

Filed under:


The European Commission has challenged austerity-conscious EU governments by demanding another 11.2 billion euro (£9.5 billion) to cover unpaid bills this year.

The move - instantly condemned by a UK Government spokesman as unacceptable - follows a deal on the EU's long-term budget in February which Prime Minister David Cameron hailed as the first to cut costs in real terms. But Euro-MPs warned at the time that acceptance of cuts came with a catch - more cash would be needed to cover outstanding commitments this year.
Now the European Commission has tabled a "draft amending budget" claiming the extra cash for what the budget commissioner described as "a snowballing effect of unpaid claims transferred on to the following year".

Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski - effectively blaming Mr Cameron and others who pressed, ultimately successfully, to keep spending down in line with national restraints - said: "This (extra budget demand) cannot come as a surprise. In recent years voted EU budgets have been increasingly below the real needs based on estimates from member states."

Mr Lewandowski went on: "The ostrich policy can only work for so long: postponing payment of a bill will not make it go away. Not one cent of the extra amount we request today is for the EU institutions. It will merely allow the EU to play its share of infrastructure or science projects that member states agreed to start in the past." He added: "I am confident that the Council (EU governments) and the European Parliament will deliver on their commitments to avoid any shortfall in payments and take a swift decision on this proposal."

A Commission statement said the EU budget needed the top-up - involving extra contributions from national coffers - "to reimburse beneficiaries of EU-funded programmes completed across Europe in 2012 as well as to honour Cohesion Policy (money for poorest EU regions) claims that will fall due in 2013".

The statement said the bulk of the proposed draft extra budget would, if agreed "in full" by ministers and MEPs, "allow all the legal obligations left pending at the end of 2012, as well as those arising before the end of 2013, to be covered in this year's (2013) budget". The statement said the extra budget covers "claims from beneficiaries of EU funds (member states, regions and towns, universities and scientists, NGOs etc) for projects completed across Europe; it also includes member states' estimates for payments they will expect from the EU this year".

Commission officials pointed out that they were demanding far less than the 16 billion euro (£13.6 billion) many MEPs are insisting upon for outstanding financial commitments for 2013 in exchange for final approval of the long-term "austerity" EU budget for 2014-2020. Only two weeks ago, European Parliament president Martin Schulz warned that "Parliament will not even start negotiations (on the long-term budget) until all unpaid payment claims for 2012 are covered".

But Conservative MEPs promised "fierce resistance" to the Commission's budget top-up, which, although less than the amount being sought by the Parliament, still exceeds the size of the EU bailout just agreed for Cyprus. Richard Ashworth, the leader of the Tory MEPs and a negotiator on the Parliament's Budget Committee, slammed the Commission demand as "confrontational and disruptive".

Financial Secretary to the Treasury Greg Clark said: "This is a totally unacceptable request from the Commission at a time when most EU member states are taking difficult decisions to reduce public spending. It is extraordinary that the Commission should demand an increase in the EU budget that is bigger than the rescue package that was agreed for Cyprus earlier this week."

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Plea for disabled support analysis

$
0
0

Filed under:


Disabled people will lose a total of £28 billion in support by 2018 as a result of welfare cuts coming into effect next week, according to research.

And thousands will be hit by as many as six cuts at the same time, losing up to £4,600 a household annually, according to the analysis by think tank Demos for disability charity Scope.
Demos urged the Government to make its own assessment of the cumulative impact of 13 changes to benefits including disability living allowance, employment and support allowance, housing benefit and welfare deductions for social housing tenants deemed to have a spare room.

According to Demos, a total of 3.7 million disabled people will be affected by the cuts taking effect on April 1, with an estimated 3,000 people hit by six separate cuts and 12,500 by five.

The think tank's deputy director Claudia Wood said: "While striking, these calculations will invariably be an underestimate of the true impact of the cuts - as we opted for the most conservative estimates on the more unknown elements of reform.

"What's shocking is that the Government doesn't assess the likely combined impact of these changes - only the impact of each change individually. However, many disabled families are being affected by combinations of four, five and even six changes, so we're asking the Government to change tack, and start to publish cumulative impact assessments."

Scope chief executive Richard Hawkes said: "At the moment there's no place for disabled people in the Chancellor's aspiration nation. In 2013, disabled people are already struggling to pay the bills. Living costs are spiralling. Income is flat-lining. We know many are getting in debt, just to pay for essentials.

"What's the Government's response? The same group of disabled people face not just one or two cuts to their support, but in some cases three, four, five or even six cuts."

But a spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "There's a lot of misleading stories about the impact of our welfare reforms on disabled people, which could lead to unnecessary scaremongering. The truth is this Government is absolutely committed to supporting disabled people and we continue to spend around £50 billion a year on disabled people and their services.

"Our reforms will make sure the billions we spend every year give more targeted support and better reflect today's understanding of disability. Hundreds of thousands of disabled adults and children will actually receive more support than now with the combined effect of benefit changes under Universal Credit."

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Can banks take your savings?

$
0
0

Filed under:

Coins in handYou know those savings you have in the bank.You always assumed they were yours, didn't you? Nobody could touch them without your permission. No matter how much or how little you had, your savings were sacrosanct.
They thought that in Cyprus as well, but they were wrong. Their savings turned out to be at the mercy of politicians, who saw them as a reservoir of cash to be drained at will.

Could it happen to your savings?

Russian roulette
In a bid to bail out their banking system, the Cypriot government proposed scooping up to 10% out of every single bank account to pay for the €10 billion bailout. Imagine that happening to your savings.

The original proposal was shot down, out of pity for the little savers, but the savings grab is still going ahead, targeted at wealthier savers.

Under eurozone rules, the first €100,000 of savings, roughly £85,000, are protected from a banking collapse. Cyprus savers with more than that will lose up to 40% of their money. Read more in Cyprus bailout deal spares savers with small deposits

Many of them will be gold-encrusted Russian oligarchs who have used Cyprus as their money-laundering base in the EU, so it's hard to feel too much sympathy for them.

But others will be ordinary people who spent a lifetime squirrelling money away for their retirement, and naively thought that money belonged to them. This includes an estimated 60,000 British expats.

What's yours is theirs
Savers were assured that Cyprus was a special case, until leading Dutch finance minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem suggested this cash grab could form a "model" for future Eurozone bailouts.

His words sent a chill down the spine of savers in troubled Eurozone colonies such as Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and even France. Banking stocks in these countries plunged.

Thankfully, the UK isn't in the Eurozone. Mr Dijsselbloem can't help himself to your money, can he?

We're closed
If you're a UK expat with a bank account in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece or France, your money isn't as safe as you thought, even if you hold less than €100,000.

Any funds above that level are absolutely in the firing line come the next Eurozone bailout (you're not telling me this is the last one).

You would be crazy to take a chance with that money. Because when crisis strikes, the authorities can close banks faster than you can fight your way to the ATM. That's what happened in Cyprus. Every bank has now been shut for 11 days, to stop a run on the currency.

Even when the banks do reopen, there will be limits on cash withdrawals and controls on taking capital out of the country. Whose money is it anyway?

If your money in a foreign bank is there to fund, say, the running costs of a second home in Spain, try to keep the bare working minimum overseas.

Sound as a pound
What about UK deposits? Sterling may be one of the world's weakest major currencies right now, but thankfully, we don't share it with anybody, including the Germans.

In the UK, we have our own deposit protection scheme, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This guarantees the first £85,000 of your money (£170,000 for couples), should your bank, building society or credit union collapse.

Anybody who remembers desperate savers lining up outside the branches of bankrupt Northern Rock in September 2007 won't want to have a penny above that threshold.

Savers with larger sums must reduce their risk by spreading it between different banks. But watch out, that £85,000 limit only applies per banking licence.

Some institutions share a single licence, because they are owned by the same parent company. For example, The AA, Birmingham Midshires, Halifax and Saga all come under the Bank of Scotland licence. If you had, say, £50,000 with the AA, and £50,000 with Halifax, you would only get £85,000 of protection. You can check the full list of shared licences here.

Double Dutch
Few UK savers will now be willing to park their savings with foreign-owned banks trading in the UK without FSCS protection. Happily, this practice is now dying out.

Some 50,000 UK savers had accounts with the Bank of Cyprus, but they have enjoyed FSCS protection since last year (as do UK savers with Spanish-owned Santander and Indian-owned ICICI Bank UK). The estimated 13,000 who have savings with Laiki Bank UK aren't covered, although the bank has assured them their money is safe. If you trust banker assurances, that is.

Anglo-Irish Bank isn't covered by the FSCS, but that is closed to new business anyway. Its savers are protected by the stricken Irish government, and should shift their money back to Blighty if they can.

That only leaves Triodos Bank, the Dutch-owned sustainable bank, that comes under the Dutch deposit protection scheme. Holland still has a AAA credit rating, so it should be safer than most. But these days, who knows?

Savers shouldn't really have to make judgements on whether governments are solvent.

Great Britain
If you have money in an offshore savings account, you will rely on the local deposit protection scheme, even if the bank is the subsidiary of a major UK name.

So if you have money with Nationwide International, based on the Isle of Man, your money is in the hands of the Isle of Man depositors' protection scheme. This protects 100% of the first £30,000 savings and 90% of the next £20,000. Maximum compensation is £48,000, no matter how much you have saved.

Some British depositors in Icelandic bank Kaupthing, Singer & Friedlander (Isle of Man) lost a lifetime of savings in the 2008 financial crisis. Their stories are heartbreaking.

The banks really can swallow your money. So spread it around, never exceed deposit compensation limits, and wherever possible, make sure it is covered by the FSCS. Sometimes British really is best.

 
More stories

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The Fixer: European breakdown cover

$
0
0

Filed under:

The Fixer logoHave you been left out of pocket due to poor service or sharp practice? Do you have a money problem that won't go away?

It can seem impossible to get a fair result when you are battling a financial issue alone. But never fear! The AOL Money Fixer is here to help.

Dear Fixer,
On Saturday, I am driving my car, a Skoda Octavia, to France for a week long family holiday.

I have had it serviced recently and will check the oil and the tyre pressure etc before setting off.

But the journey will take a good seven hours, including the ferry, and I am still worried about the car breaking down at some point on the way there or back.

This would be bad news anyway, as a seven-hour journey with two kids under five is stressful enough.

But as neither my wife nor I speak much French, I have a feeling that sorting out a breakdown of this kind would probably prove difficult and expensive to boot.

I have breakdown cover with the AA in this country, but I do not think that it covers European trips.

Are there any breakdown policies that do this and if so, what is the cheapest way to get one that will ensure we get help if we need it?

J Turner, Haslemere

Dear Mr Turner,

Breakdown cover is one of those financial products you spend money on in the hope that you will never need it.

But should your tyre burst on a French A road, you will be very relieved to have a breakdown service to call I'm sure.

European cover does not generally come as standard with a UK policy, so I am not surprised that your AA cover does not include it.

Instead, it can be bought either to last for the length your trip or as a 12-month add-on to your UK policy.

Annual policies start at under £60, but you should be able to get a single-trip policy for quite a bit less.

So unless you are planning to drive to the Continent again in the next 12 months, the cheapest option will probably be a singe-trip policy.

To ensure you get the best price, I would advise contacting the AA first to find out how much it would charge you to add that to your current policy.

Then compare this with the deals available from rivals such as RAC and Green Flag on a comparison website like MoneySupermarket. Have a great holiday.

The Fixer

Whatever your financial problem, write to themoneyfixer@aim.com and The AOL Money Fixer will get on the case.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

15-year old campaigner sells her story for £2 million

$
0
0

Filed under:

Malala YousafzaiAP Photo/Sherin Zada

Malala Yousafzai has shown extraordinary bravery in her short life so far. The 15-year-old from Pakistan became an outspoken advocate for women's education, after she started writing a blog on the BBC Urdu service.

Last year she was shot by the Taliban. Now she has sold her story.

The deal was announced by Arzu Tahsin, deputy publishing director, of Weidenfeld & Nicolson, who said the book would be available around the world from this autumn.

According to the Guardian, Yousafzai will receive £2 million: she will tell her story, and underline the plight of the 61 million children who are unable to get access to education.

Her story

It's a shocking story. She started the blog, under the pseudonym Gul Makai, after the Taliban took control of the area she lived in and banned girls from going to school. The area in question changed hands repeatedly, but whenever the Taliban seized control, the ban would be put in place.

Her identify became widely known after she appeared in a New York Times documentary, and she became a media spokesperson, fighting for the right of girls to go to school. At the end of 2011 she was awarded Pakistan's first National Youth Peace Prize.

However, ten months later, she was shot in the head on board a school bus and left for dead. She was flown to the UK, where she was treated at a hospital in Birmingham. Now, five months later, she has returned to school.

In the interim she has become the youngest person ever to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, her father has been appointed a UN educational advisor, and the UN has created Malala Day. A charitable fund has also been set up in her name, to promote the education and empowerment of girls in Pakistan and the world.

The book

The BookTrade.info service reported Tahsin's words: "This book will be a document to bravery, courage and vision. Malala is so young to have experienced so much and I have no doubt that her story will be an inspiration to readers from all generations who believe in the right to education and the freedom to pursue it"

Michael Pietsch, executive vice president and publisher of Little, Brown and Company - which has the worldwide right to the book - added: "Malala is already an inspiration to millions around the world. Reading her story of courage and survival will open minds, enlarge hearts, and eventually allow more girls and boys to receive the education they hunger for."

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Shop worker guilty of lottery syndicate fraud

$
0
0

Filed under:

Maidstone Crown CourtTom Pugh/PA

Shopkeeper Imran Pervais, from Gravesend in Kent, has been found guilty of trying to con a lottery syndicate out of a £80,000 win - by telling them they had won just £10.

Pervais had argued it was just an honest mistake, but Maidstone Crown Court disagreed.

The fraud

As we reported yesterday, syndicate manager Callum Crosier went to Moores Convenience Store in Gravesend - where Pervais worked - and handed over four tickets bought for his syndicate for the previous Saturday's National Lottery draw. The first came up with a £10 win, and when another ticket came up as another winner, Crosier asked if it was another £10 - to which Pervais replied that it was.

It was only a few days later when Crosier returned to work and checked the numbers that he realised the ticket had matched five numbers and the bonus ball, and therefore should have been worth far more. He returned to the shop, a different cashier found the ticket screwed up on the floor, and Crosier took it back.

The National Lottery investigated, and discovered that the line had been scanned, so Pervais should have known about the full extent of the win. They contacted police.

Pervais argued that it had been a genuine mistake, and that he had no intention of trying to claim the money for himself. However, the jurors disagreed. They found him guilty, and he will be sentenced at a later date. According to ITV, the judge warned him that he could face jail.

Crosier told BBC South East: "I was gutted because I was in charge of it [the syndicate], so I'd felt like I'd let everyone down, and also that I'd put trust in someone and they attempted to rob me."

Camelot said in a statement: "We have stringent operations in place to prevent and detect fraud and to monitor suspicious activity, and where we believe unlawful activity has taken place, we will not hesitate to work with the appropriate enforcement body."

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

UK ministers announce oil strategy

$
0
0

Filed under:



An oil and gas strategy that aims to secure thousands of jobs and billions of pounds of investment is being announced by the UK Government.

Three secretaries of state will be in Aberdeen, known as the oil capital of Europe, to describe plans for "tax certainty", supply chain support and skills development.
Business Secretary Vince Cable, Scottish Secretary Michael Moore and Energy Secretary Ed Davey will speak to business leaders about the strategy.

Meanwhile, the Government announced £7 million to set up an "extreme" engineering centre for subsea and offshore engineering in Newcastle.

Mr Cable, who will open a facility at offshore specialists Expro in Aberdeen, said: "I want us to consider what barriers are stopping British companies bidding for and winning work in the North Sea. This is an expanding industry. We can either help create more jobs and opportunities across the UK if we get this right, or see work going overseas if not."

Mr Davey said the oil and gas industry is a vital strategic resource.

"With our support for carbon capture and storage, for decommissioning and by encouraging increased collaboration across different energy sectors, especially offshore, there will also be new sustainable growth opportunities for the industry and the wider UK supply chain."

Mr Moore said: "We've made sure that this strategy encompasses the whole industry to make sure we identify the measures that will benefit business, large, medium or small."

The industry employs about 400,000 people and provides nearly half the UK's energy needs, the Government said.

The future of the oil industry is key in the debate about Scottish independence. The Scottish National Party argues that the country can look forward to an oil boom in the early years of independence, assuming a Yes vote in September 2014. Opponents warn against over-reliance on a volatile resource, prone to fluctuations in revenue.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Amazon rapped for using the C-word in advert

$
0
0

Filed under:

AmazonAP Photo/Frank Augstein

The Advertising Standards Authority has ruled that Amazon offended internet users, after featuring the C-word. The offensive advert in question was an image of a card from smellyourmum.com, which featured the words "You're a C**t [spelling the word out in full]. Sorry I meant to say 'Merry Christmas'. Amazon repeated the words in text alongside the card - replacing the U with an asterisk.

The ASA upheld a complain from an offended customer, but Amazon is unrepentant.

Defence

In smellyourmum.com's response to the ASA investigation, it said the word should be considered in the context of the fact it appeared on a humorous card intended for close friends or family, and "in that context it was simply the set-up to the punchline of the gag."

They added that when used with the positive qualifier of 'Merry Christmas' it :"could convey a positive sense". In an unusual tack, they also said: "A documentary devoted to the word had been broadcast on the BBC and they believed that if it was acceptable to broadcast a documentary which used the word repeatedly and which had greater reach than their advertising in terms of audience, it was acceptable to use it in their advertising."

Amazon

Amazon also responded to the investigation, arguing that it was a card rather than an advert that had featured the words - and therefore was none of the ASA's business. They said it was appropriate for the ASA to investigate ads used to generate sales, but it was inappropriate for the ASA to investigate the display of a product for sale, especially if that investigation targeted one retailer among many selling the same product online.

It added that even if ASA chose to consider this to be an advert, it had done nothing wrong. It said: "The card was not offensive, aggressive or lewd in its message. The wording of the card did not target any particular group, nor was it likely to cause offence to any particular race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability or age. It was meant as a bit of light-hearted, irreverent fun."

They added that "the subjective values of a small minority who might find it distasteful should not dictate a product's availability or the method of its advertisement to the wider public."

And they said that the image had not been included in any mailings, and therefore would only have been found by those seeking out Christmas cards. This, they said, wasn't the sort of thing that children tended to do, so "the only people who were likely to come across the listing were adults."

ASA ruling


ASA disagreed. It ruled that the product listing constituted an advert - and therefore fell within its remit. It added that despite the fact it didn't target any particular group and was most likely to be seen by adults it had still gone too far.

It said: "Consumer research showed that the use of the word 'c**t' was so likely to offend that it should not be used at all in marketing communications even when it was relevant to the name of the product. We noted the expletive in the product description was partly obscured by an asterisk but considered that even in the absence of the product image which showed the word in full, the intended meaning was still clear. We concluded the ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence."

Amazon has been banned from using the advert in its current form, and smellyourmum has been warned to take care when advertising the product in future.

But what do you think? is this any of the ASA's business? And is Amazon at fault? Let us know in the comments.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Why does George Osborne hate self-employed women?

$
0
0

Filed under:


The current system actively penalises self-employed women. Why?

I'm a hard-working mother of one, with number two due any day now. I work as a freelance journalist and copywriter, juggling my work commitments with caring for a boisterous toddler. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that I work very hard, as most parents of young children do.
Yet the system doesn't reward my hard work. In fact, I believe that self-employed women are penalised by the country's current maternity leave laws, and I can't understand why you haven't addressed that. Maybe you haven't noticed?

Here's why the current maternity pay and allowance system actually incentivises self-employed women to give up work.

Different limits, different rights
First of all, let's take a look at what employed women get. Statutory maternity pay (SMP) is currently £135.45 a week or 90% of earnings lower than that. During the Maternity Pay Period (MPP), women can work in a self-employed capacity without losing their pay.

When I had my first baby I told my employer I didn't plan to return and took statutory maternity leave before handing in my notice. I didn't feel bad about that, I'd paid my NI and the company could reclaim my SMP through HMRC. I'd also been very honest about my plans rather than keeping quiet and hedging my bets.

Most importantly for our family finances, there was nothing stopping me from setting up as a freelancer while I was on maternity leave. The Department for Work and Pensions states: "If you do any work in a self-employed capacity during your MPP, then such work will not affect your SMP."

So I was able to start building up my freelancing during my maternity leave. At the end of my maternity break, I was an economically active individual who continued to pay tax.

Now I am about to have baby number two and it's all changed. Because I am self-employed, I cannot receive SMP but I can claim Maternity Allowance of £135.45 a week or 90% of earnings lower than that. So far, so fair.

However, unlike when I was receiving SMP, I cannot work in a freelance capacity without losing that entitlement. Over the 39-week period I can claim for, I'm allowed to work ten 'keep in touch' (KIT) days without ending my allowance. However, if I work more than those then I'm deemed to be back at work.

Frustratingly, that doesn't mean I can work for 80 hours stretched over the period - if I spend just five minutes emailing a client then that counts as a full day.

The DWP explains: "Any work you do as a KIT day, even as little as half an hour for example, will be counted as a whole day for KIT days."

In short, the vast majority of self-employed women face a tough decision. Either they take a far shorter maternity leave or they shut up shop. That means that at the end of their paid leave, they have to start building up their business all over again - making it likely they will pay less tax during that period.

George, why on earth would you have a system that incentivises self-employed women to cease trading?

The numbers affected
So just how many women could be in my position? 'Many' is the answer. The press has extensively covered the rise of the 'mumpreneur'; women who go it alone in order to work flexibly around their family commitments.

In fact, a survey by the Office for National Statistics back in 2009 showed that women were nearly five times more likely to cite family as their reason for becoming self-employed.

And it's not just flexible working hours fuelling the rise; as the economy flounders more women need to work to fund their families. You may have noticed that it's a pretty tough jobs market just now.

Many employers will hesitate to employ mothers of young children, as we do tend to need flexible or part-time hours and we have to take time off when our kids are sick. A report from the TUC found that women were behind more than half the increase in self-employment since the recession began.

We are making our own jobs, we're making our own way and we're paying into the country's coffers. So why does the current system incentivise us to go out of business?

A question of fairness
Maybe some people reading this will think it's unfair that employed parents can freelance during their maternity leave and not lose their pay. Maybe some people will say that no one should have kids if they don't have money saved in the bank to cover their baby break - I see comments like that on news sites and blogs a lot.

Of course I disagree with that position, but it's a separate issue really. Currently, self-employed women are worse off than employed women, despite paying NI and tax.

And on top of that, we lack job security, company pensions, death-in-service benefits or any of the perks of employment. We can't even save money by claiming childcare vouchers as an employer has to issue those - an issue I hope the Government plans to address in the 2015 childcare voucher changes. Read Parents can reclaim up to £1,200 under new childcare scheme for more.

But I'm not complaining about that; going freelance was my choice and there are many perks. The most important one is that I can spend more time with my babies.

However, I cannot understand why the current system actively encourages self-employed mums to close down their businesses.

Mr Osborne, it's illegal for a company to penalise a woman or harm her career because she took maternity leave. Yet under the current system, that's exactly what the state is doing to self-employed mums every day. This isn't fair and it can't make economic sense - you need our taxes and you don't want us claiming unemployment benefits.

What do you think? Is the current system fair? Would you iron out the unfairness by stopping women on statutory maternity leave from working too? Or do you agree that Osborne is preventing mums from maintaining successful businesses? Have your say in the comments below.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Is Now The Time To Buy Barclays PLC?

$
0
0

Filed under:

I'm always searching for shares that can help ordinary investors like you make money from the stock market.

So right now I am trawling through the FTSE 100 and giving my verdict on every member of the blue-chip index. Simply put, I'm hoping to pinpoint the very best buying opportunities in today's uncertain market.

Today I am looking at Barclays (LSE: BARC) (NYSE: BCS.US) to determine whether you should consider buying the shares at 290p.

I am assessing each company on several ratios:

Price/Earnings (P/E): Does the share look good value when compared against its competitors?

Price Earnings Growth (PEG): Does the share look good value factoring in predicted growth?

Yield: Does the share provide a solid income for investors?

Dividend Cover: Is the dividend sustainable?

So let's look at the numbers:

Stock Price 3-yr EPS growth Projected P/E PEG Yield 3-yr dividend growth Dividend cover
Barclays 290p 40% 7.8 0.7 3.3% 18% 5

The consensus analyst estimate for this year's earnings per share is 37p (11% growth) and dividend per share is 7.2p (11% growth).

Trading on a projected P/E of 7.8, Barclays appears cheaper than its peers in the bank sector, which are currently trading on an average P/E of around 18.4.

Barclays' P/E and double digit growth rate give a PEG ratio of around 0.7, which implies the share is under-priced for the near-term earnings growth the firm is expected to produce.

At 3.3%, Barclays' dividend income is about the same as the bank sector average. Additionally, Barclays has a three-year compounded dividend growth rate of 18%, implying the yield will grow in line with that of the company's peers.

Indeed, the dividend is slightly more than five times covered by earnings, giving Barclays plenty room for further payout growth.

Finally, Barclays' share price is currently 34% below the bank's net asset value of 438p per share at the end of 2012.

Barclays appears cheaper than its peers in the bank sector, so is now the time to buy?

I believe Barclays is one of the most financially stable and profitable banks in the FTSE 100. During 2012, Barclays' underlying profit before tax jumped 26% from the previous year to just over £7 billion.

Having said that, like the majority of its peers in the banking sector, Barclays was forced to take an accounting charge relating to the value of its own debt, as well as increase its provision for Payment Protection Insurance claims. As a result, the company's overall 2012 profit before tax was reduced to only £250 million.

Nonetheless, Barclays appears to have a solid capital base. For example, at the end of 2012, the bank had a Tier 1 capital ratio of just under 11% and a loan-to-deposit ratio of 110%, which indicates that almost all of the bank's loans are covered by customer deposits.

However, Barclays has something that the majority of its UK peers do not and that is a large presence in Africa. In particular, Barclays is focused on becoming the leading bank on the African continent with its 'One Bank in Africa' strategy.

Indeed, Barclays currently has more than 14 million African customers across ten countries and Barclays' African division accounted for 10% of the whole group's net operating income during 2012.

So overall, based on Barclays' current discount to peers and the group's African exposure, I believe now looks to be a good time to buy Barclays at 290p.

More FTSE opportunities

As well as Barclays, I am also positive on the FTSE 100 share highlighted within this exclusive free report.

You see, the blue chip in question offers a 5.7% income, its shares might be worth 850p compared to about 700p now -- and it has just been declared "The Motley Fool's Top Income Stock For 2013"!

Just click here to read the report -- it's free.

In the meantime, please stay tuned for my next verdict on a FTSE 100 share.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Tory MPs want £31,000 pay rise

$
0
0

Filed under:

British MPs are struggling to make ends meet on £65,738 a year. A new Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) says 70% of MPs claim they deserve a +32% pay rise, potentially lifting salaries to £86,250.

And 20% of MPs thought remuneration of at least £95,000 a year was deserving. Could MPs get the salary jump they want?


More please

Pay packets for most ordinary Britons - the average British wage in 2013 is £30,917 for men and £24,253 for women, according to Payscale - struggle to keep pace with rising food and energy costs. In terms of public relations, hiking the pay of MPs would be tricky.

However ex-Cabinet minister and Labour MP Jack Straw says the time for a MP pay bump is as good as any. The Telegraph quotes ex Lib Dem defence minister Sir Nick Harvey. Harvey claims it unreasonable for MPs to make "enormous" financial sacrifices for their job.

Harvey thinks a £65,000 salary for a post that requires no training or qualification is not acceptable.

£31,000 hike

Looking at pay ambitions along party lines, the IPSA online interviews with 100 MPs revealed that some Tory MPs thought annual salaries should come closer to £96,740; Lib Dems thought the right salary was £78,361, while Labour members of the House of Commons plumped for £77,322, on average.

Not a great difference between Lib Dems and Labour - £1,039 - there while the gap between Labour pay wants and the Tories extends to £19,418. This gap widens to £31,000 if you compare what a Tory MP currently makes and what some Tory MPs would like to claim.

On average however across all parties, the survey found that MPs want a 32% pay hike to £86,250.

Bear in mind MPs who take on extra responsibilities such as Select Committee Chairs receive extra payments of up to £14,582. There are also other benefits MPs have including childcare vouchers and greatly subsidised meals.

Pension advantage

Many MPs are indeed hard working and there is some justification for a pay rise, given the workload, responsibility and stress of the role. But the pleading for more money does not look good against, for example, the abandonment of plans to hike MPs pension contributions in 2013.

There was supposed to be a 1.85% increase in how much MPs would pay into their final salary scheme. But IPSA intervened and the move was abandoned.

At the same time, many public sector workers are seeing substantial hikes in the cost of their pension contributions. Meanwhile the scandal of MPs expenses still resonates.

 

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Judge clears way for airline merger

$
0
0

Filed under:


American Airlines has won bankruptcy court approval to merge with US Airways and form the world's biggest airline.

"The merger is an excellent result. I don't think anybody disputes that," Judge Sean Lane said before issuing his decision.
But the judge declined to sign off on a proposed 20 million-dollar (£13m) severance package for Tom Horton, currently chief executive of American's parent AMR Corporation.

The approval is an important milestone for American, which filed for bankruptcy in November 2011 after having long resisted using the bankruptcy process to cut labour and other costs. The merger still needs approval from Department of Justice antitrust regulators and US Airways shareholders. It is expected to close by the autumn.

The combined airline will have 6,700 daily flights and annual revenue of about 40 billion dollars (£26.4bn). The new American Airlines will fly slightly more passengers than United, the current number one, and will be run by Doug Parker, CEO of US Airways Group, who began pursuing a merger shortly after American entered bankruptcy protection.

The US trustee, a government bankruptcy watchdog, had objected to the severance package for Mr Horton. While he did not question the amount, Judge Lane agreed that the timing of it seemed to breach bankruptcy law.

"Approving it today is just not appropriate," he said. The judge plans to issue a written decision at a later date explaining his reasoning.

Mr Horton has spent nearly his entire career at American, becoming CEO when the company filed for bankruptcy. He will cede the CEO position to Mr Parker when the deal closes and has agreed to leave the company's board within a year of the closing date.

In 2011 Mr Horton was paid a salary of 618,135 dollars (£409,000). He also received stock awards and options that were valued that year at nearly 2.7 million dollars (£1.8m), but the company argued those could be nearly worthless after the bankruptcy reorganisation. Figures for 2012 were not yet available. The proposed severance package includes 19.9 million dollars (£13m) in cash and stock as well as a lifetime of free first-class tickets on American for Mr Horton and his wife.

Mr Horton could still receive the payout. American's lawyers offered a possible solution during the hearing whereby American and US Airways would amend their merger agreement to say that Mr Horton's severance would be subject to ratification of the board of directors of the new airline, after the merger closes.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 18742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images